Thursday, January 28, 2010

SOTU

President Obama may have vowed not to quit when it comes to battling the politics of the Hill in his State of the Union address last night, but his talk of foreign policy sounded more fatigued.

Outlining the ways in which he plans to protect and advance the country in the context of foreign policy, Obama seemed to have changed his tone towards the Muslim world from one of dialogue to one of control:

That's the leadership that we are providing –- engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We're working through the G20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We're working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We're helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease -– a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad. [emphasis added]

Compare that tidbit about the need to enlighten Muslim societies to his famous Cairo speech given last summer to the Muslim world in which he acknowledges the innovation Muslim communities have already provided and pushes for more dialogue:

As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam - at places like Al-Azhar University - that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.


What the Cairo speech had done so well was recognize the complexities of the Muslim world that could help lead to prosperity. Obama essentially acknowledged that while some communities may foster fanaticism, others are pushing the limits of science, philosophy and politics. But after last night, it seemed as if Obama had reduced foreign policy towards the Middle East to one-sided action rather than two-sided engagement: Iran got an ultimatum, the discussion of Iraq mainly focused on getting the troops out, Afghanistan was spoken of in the context of terrorists rather than state-building, democracy and civil society.

It’s clear that Obama is desperately trying to regain control and leadership as his poll numbers plunge and the situation in Af-Pak grows increasingly dire. I can’t blame him. With a tough year of failures at home and abroad, Obama needs to remind others he is a leader. But like he said, leaders must do what is difficult, not what is easy. It’s difficult to engage in dialogue that test our assumptions and challenge our limits, but all I’m saying is, don’t quit.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Pakistan news by Juan Cole

Thanks to R. for sending the most comprehensive and analytical piece on Pakistan I've read in a while, written by Juan Cole:

http://www.juancole.com/2010/01/gates-strikes-out-in-pakistan.html

Is it just me or has coverage on Pakistan been slipping almost parallel to the White House's failing policies in Af-Pak?

Friday, January 22, 2010

One year later, the same story

Glenn Greenwald’s wrote a perceptive piece in today’s Salon about what the Supreme Court did right in the Citizens United case. Although I’m still mulling over whether or not I completely agree with his arguments, I’m concerned here with a sentence tucked away in his article:

“And one can't help but note the vile irony that Muslim "War on Terror" detainees have been essentially declared by some courts not to be "persons" under the Constitution, whereas corporations are.”

One year after Obama declared that he would close down Guantanamo, detainees are still being held without trial – indefinitely. Here’s the real kicker: Obama has decided to continue detention without due process for these detainees.

Almost sounds like one of the many failed policies employed by our last president. In his defense (if one can be made), when President Bush opened Guantanamo, he was faced with a terrified and vulnerable nation, and an uncertain global political environment. In short, given US’s history and actions towards Italians, Jews, and Japanese (among others), racism and racial profiling against Muslims was inevitable.

But it has been nine years. And I am, once again, left to question how, after countless debates over war and foreign policy, after actually fighting two wars, we can still ignore racial politics and blatant injustice? The least that needs to happen here is an actual trial for each of the detainees.

As a side note, a few people on Facebook did not deem today’s story about Gitmo detainees held without trial worthy, since there are so many other issues to worry about (unemployed, health care, bad economy). I hate to say it, but civil liberties is still a right reserved for only some groups in the U.S.